To Be or Not To Be |
|
A little kingdom I possess, Where thoughts and feelings dwell; And very hard the task I find Of governing it well. ~ Louisa May Alcott ...that more or less describes my situation!
~A Wise Man Said~ It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. ~ Aristotle
~Follow Me~ @sylverplait
Email
~Archives~
December 2001 January 2002 February 2002 March 2002 April 2002 May 2002 June 2002 July 2002 August 2002 September 2002 October 2002 November 2002 December 2002 January 2003 February 2003 March 2003 April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 July 2006 September 2006 October 2006 November 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 August 2007 October 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 March 2009 April 2009 May 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 October 2009 November 2009 January 2010 February 2010 April 2010 June 2010 September 2010 October 2010 December 2010 January 2011 February 2011 March 2011 April 2011 May 2011 June 2011 July 2011 September 2011 October 2011 January 2012 February 2012 March 2012 April 2012 June 2012 July 2012 August 2012 October 2012 November 2012 December 2012 January 2013 April 2013 May 2013 July 2013 October 2013 December 2013 January 2014 February 2014 April 2014 May 2014 July 2014 September 2014 October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 January 2015 March 2015 May 2015 June 2015 July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 December 2015 March 2016 June 2016 August 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 April 2017 May 2017 June 2017 October 2017 December 2017 January 2018 March 2018 April 2018 June 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 September 2020 October 2020 November 2020 December 2020 January 2021 February 2021 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 April 2022 May 2022 June 2022 July 2022 August 2022 September 2022 October 2022 November 2022 December 2022 January 2023 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 May 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023 September 2023 October 2023 November 2023 December 2023 January 2024 February 2024 March 2024 April 2024 May 2024 June 2024 July 2024 August 2024 September 2024 October 2024 November 2024 December 2024 January 2025 February 2025 March 2025 April 2025 May 2025 June 2025 July 2025 August 2025 |
Saturday, May 04, 2019
I have written about my explorations on the question of the existence of
God but never really explored in analytical terms the question of religion. I
do know that I have believed for a long time now that religion is distinct from
‘God’ and ‘man-made’ to use a crude term in the sense that religion was created
by people and it was not ‘created’ by God even if people say that their
religion is the only means to the one God. That being my position I never
really ‘believed’ in religion at all or rather that religion is the means to
the one God (if he exists) even though I do call myself a Catholic simply
because I was born in a family professing the faith and it’s something of an
inherited identity for me (with some practices that go with it) rather than a
suggestion that I ‘believe’ that that’s the only route to ‘God’.
Now, in the course of my research (yes, dear reader, everything seems to
flow from my research these days ;)), I was going through what ‘Hinduism’ is
all about and the question of ‘what is religion’ came up in the context of why
or how ‘Hinduism’ came to be characterised as a religion. I admit that even
though I had sort of subconsciously worked out that religion is ‘man-made’, I
never really thought about how it came to be ‘made’ and what the implications
of this ‘making’ were in a historical or worldview sense. What I understand now
is that rather than Christianity or other religions being fitted into a broad
category called Religion, it was Christianity itself that gave birth to this
category of Religion, and from then on, based on the features of Christianity,
the category Religion developed its general features which evolved over a
period of time. And this broad category based on specific features was then
applied to other ‘almost similar’ phenomena and brought within the ambit of
that category. Sometimes the phenomena themselves were diverse and fragmented
and loose such that they were brought together under a common label such as in
the case of Hinduism to be placed under the category of Religion—as that was a
western way of making sense of an eastern phenomena that did not fit into any
other classification within their cultural view. This also meant that the
eastern ‘religions’ not having the same features as the western ones could be
considered outlandish by western standards even though they were outlandish by
the very same standards that they had adopted in the first place to classify
what should come under ‘religion’!
This makes me think: what purpose does this category Religion really serve?
One obvious purpose from a historical point of view seems to be—specifically
from the point of view of western or what are called Abrahamic religions
including Islam—to delineate which path leads to God and who is the one true God.
Which is why these religions since inception have had a stake in proving their
superiority over other religions if not to actually delegitimise other
religions because the very foundation of a religion would be threatened if it
were to accept that there was another way of reaching God or that God himself
could be affiliated to a different religious order. If there was a different
path to reaching God and not this one, then why should I follow this path could
be a natural question. The wars and bloodshed that have occurred in the name of
religion (and arguably still occur today) make sense when one notes that this
question of superiority or legitimacy is not really a theoretical question but
crucially and profoundly affects one’s very existence, not just on earth but
‘beyond’. Additionally, whoever holds the key to the one true religion and
through it to the one true God, naturally also holds a position of immense
power...and one could probably think of these struggles not so much as a
struggle to establish the one true God but the struggle to establish oneself
and one’s own interest group in the position of ultimate power… because no
other form of power comes even close to one that reaches beyond death.
|